| :: |
| Author |
Message |
Uncle Mikes Rocket Shack
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 275
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:32 pm Post subject: The difference between OLA and the R.M.S Titanic? |
|
|
The Titanic had a band.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
DaLizardsLair
Joined: 15 Feb 2009
Posts: 4780
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Titanic became a really good movie. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Uncle Mikes Rocket Shack
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 275
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DaLizardsLair wrote (View Post): › docWrite("quote")The Titanic became a really good movie.
No chance of that happening with OLA |
|
| Back to top |
|
oldfogey
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Posts: 161
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:07 pm Post subject: Re: The difference between OLA and the R.M.S Titanic? |
|
|
Uncle Mikes depiction of the sinking Titanic sure is the feeling I've had about OLA for the past several months. I just can't see them being able to improve their current position. To improve, they need FM's in daily numbers and I don't believe that will happen now.
There are too many reasons for it not to. When OLA first began enlisting folks, people were sick enough of ebay not to shop around. Wasn't that many alternative sites anyway. $8 a month sounded cheap after ebay. Now, $8 has to be justified. Nevermind a lump sum of $196. There are cheaper, or free sites available now with far more professionalism. There are multiple choices. OLA has a real track record that can be researched now and we all know how horrible it is. Yes, to my way of thinking, the only people that OLA can con now are the more gullible and there aren't going to be that many of them at this point. Certainly not enough to refill their coffers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Uncle Mikes Rocket Shack
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 275
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 9:43 am Post subject: Re: The difference between OLA and the R.M.S Titanic? |
|
|
| Like I said before might as well take that $196 and flush it down the toilet. Or buy 196 cheap cigars and light each one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
